The fresh Seymour one to is offered tends to be similar to the Seymour i came to understand currently; the latest topic are showed, this new complexities shown, however, no really brand new dimensions are put in their portrait. In a way, following, the storyline is actually Pal’s, even as we see him for the first time in most their heartache out-of soul wanting to retain and you can 41
Throughout the facts, recommendations are produced, for example to the functions you to Friend has authored, you to definitely force which identification
bolster his master into challenging truths hiding in Seymour’s life. He looks inside the hopeless necessity of her or him. He raises himself initially, with some paradox, because the a keen „ecstatically happier boy“; at the end, when he makes to see group, the guy knows that „not one matter“ the guy do is „more important than starting one awful Area 307.“ Because the Seymour shortly after said, „the we carry out the whole life try move from one nothing piece of Holy Soil to another location.“ „Seymour: An intro“ may be said to have the function one to conceals setting, utilizing the appearing irrelevancies on purpose made to carry out an single incontri sesso amount greater than typical illusion regarding reality – the real facts (a technique, by-the-way, quite normal, as the experience Dostoevski’s „Notes from Below ground“ or Rilke’s The notebook off Malte Laurids Brigge). But, nonetheless, there is an ongoing question in regards to the author’s handle, any doubt that’s a bit bolstered by the Pal’s recurrent similarity to help you Salinger. Certainly one of Buddy’s performs is really This new Catcher in the Rye, several anyone else are „Increase Large this new Roof Beam, Carpenters“ (in which Friend are narrator) and you may „A perfect Day to own Bananafish“ (in which he wasn’t), nevertheless various other was „Teddy“ (Friend also prices from it). For example details since these while others do not, however, show anything, but they perform suggest – and simply strongly recommend – you to definitely Salinger are sharing, however obliquely, his personal death of control and you will diffusion out-of ability. Salinger’s much time quiet pursuing the appearance of „Seymour: An intro“ for the 1959 are ended within the 1965 to your guide of another section regarding Glass saga, „Hapworth 16, 1924.“ Which story did absolutely nothing to reassure individuals who expected a good return to the sooner perfection out of Catcher regarding Rye. Actually, it tended to complement men and women functions of your later performs and that really members receive worrisome- a tedious length, a humor commonly worry about-consciously lovable, a beneficial muting away from narrative in favor of philosophical asides. In spite 42