Notice once more one to, when utilized in new intensional sense, they showcases functions of intensional class: It looks pre-nominally (Example (13a)) which is maybe not gradable (Example (13b)).
This new category on the alternative category, that event-related adjectives, including raises normal polysemy, particularly, between experience-relevant and qualitative adjectives, because the depicted during the Instances (14) and you can (15). New participial adjective sabut (‘known‘) have a meeting-related sense, corresponding to the fresh new verb conocer (‘know‘), and you can a qualitative feel that is certainly interpreted just like the ‘wise‘. As well, the deverbal adjective cridaner derived from cridar (‘to help you shout‘) alternates anywhere between a conference-relevant experience and you can an effective qualitative feel.
Examples (14) and you can (15) portray instances of normal polysemy given that, as well as end up being taken about translations, there can be a logical shift of a clear family members for the enjoy so you can a good that contains a far more distant relation to the event. When it comes to sabut the newest loved ones is clear (in the event the a guy understands much, he could be wise); regarding cridaner, a clothing qualifies on the adjective when it is including loud-coloured otherwise has actually a peculiar cut, such that it growth the eye of individuals, just like the screaming does.
In this article, i only envision version of polysemy you to definitely clipped along the class pursued. Other kinds of polysemy which have usually become tackled in the literature may not be felt. By way of example, we’ll not concerned about this new polysemy portrayed inside the Example (16), hence perhaps enjoys a whole lot more related to the fresh semantics of one’s altered noun than simply regarding the fresh new adjective (Pustejovsky 1995). All of the latest spends from trist (‘sad‘) represented within the Example (16) belong to the fresh qualitative category, thus, up against the works from the Lapata (2000; Lapata (2001) quoted before, we really do not beat new adjective since polysemous regarding the framework of your present tests.
Because of the crossbreed decisions out-of polysemous adjectives explained inside Part step 3, we are able to assume that they function differently regarding adjectives on the basic kinds. For-instance, adjectives polysemous between a good qualitative and you may a relational play with would be to showcase a great deal more proof getting gradability than simply pure relational adjectives, however, less than sheer qualitative adjectives. Inside glance at, polysemous adjectives fall under a course, including, the qualitative-relational group, that is distinctive from both qualitative while the relational classes, generally speaking indicating feature opinions which can be in the middle the ones from this new very first kinds. In this part, we report about studies analysis correctly which design to own normal polysemy. We’re going to therefore identify between five sort of adjectives: qualitative, intensional, relational, polysemous anywhere between a qualitative and you may a keen intensional learning (intensional-qualitative), and you may polysemous between a great qualitative and a great relational learning (qualitative-relational). There was one to polysemous group shed (intensional-relational). No cases of polysemy ranging from intensional and you may relational adjectives was indeed observed inside our data.